Skip to content

GH-50171: [CI][R] Build libarrow is failing for Linux arm64 #50179

Merged
kou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
thisisnic:GH-50171-arm64
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

GH-50171: [CI][R] Build libarrow is failing for Linux arm64 #50179
kou merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
thisisnic:GH-50171-arm64

Conversation

@thisisnic

@thisisnic thisisnic commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rationale for this change

arm64 builds for libarrow failing after #50125 due to mismatched strings

What changes are included in this PR?

Update CI job to new config

Are these changes tested?

Will run archery

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 15, 2026 14:38
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ GitHub issue #50171 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Fixes Linux arm64 failures in the R “Build libarrow” CI job by aligning the ARCH environment value with Archery/Docker’s expected architecture string format.

Changes:

  • Update the R GitHub Actions task template to use arm64/v8 (instead of arm64v8) when matrix.arch is arm64.

@thisisnic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Revision: 370e038

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-9c47c63c6c

Task Status
r-binary-packages GitHub Actions

@kou kou left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@kou kou merged commit 9a7e801 into apache:main Jun 16, 2026
11 checks passed
@kou kou removed the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Jun 16, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Jun 16, 2026
@conbench-apache-arrow

Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 9a7e801.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 4 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting merge Awaiting merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants